A-Moneyless-Economy-Based-on-Reputation-and-Need.md

@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ As for the slippery slope to money, Dan suggested that we separate the consumer
 
 The economic system as conceived here is likely to produce a more egalitarian distribution of wealth. Indeed it is more like how a family works in the sense that everyone contributes and consumes from a common pool. Those who are deserving naturally get more but everyone is provided with a fairly standard floor. 
 
-In my last post I argued that we should avoid deflation because it drastically slows down the economy and reduces the pool of investment capital. Dan and Lem pointed out that this wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing because it would reduce frivolous consumer spending, help us achieve global warming goals, save natural resources, etc. I would suggest that with a claims-based distribution system we could have the best of both worlds because it introduces some friction into the consumption process but does not, in and of itself, cut us off from allowing organizations to claim resources for investment purposes.       
+In my last post I argued that we should avoid deflation because it drastically slows down the economy and reduces the pool of investment capital. Dan and Lem pointed out that this wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing because it would reduce frivolous consumer spending, save natural resources, etc. I would suggest that with a claims-based distribution system we could have the best of both worlds because it introduces some friction into the consumption process but does not, in and of itself, cut us off from allowing organizations to claim resources for investment purposes.       
 
 
 <h3>UNEQUAL WEALTH DISTRIBUTION</h3>